maanantai 25. toukokuuta 2020

Spring 2020

State of emergency, distant studying and all the rest

(The following text is based on a infoletter I wrote together with Anni Klein 4.4.2020 for a distant study project under title "State of Emergency")
Trying to understand what is happening in the world right now can be seen and interpreted as artistic thinking. One who is diving deep into a phenomena could be seen as artist at work. We’ve been interested in offering the students a frame, where they can get study credits for that work. But the situation affects us differently and one might feel overwhelmed by all what is happening, by the news, writings, comments, interpretations, warnings, suggestions and so forth. So I have also adviced the students to drop the project of diving into the depths of pandemia,  if they feel like it could challenge their well-being and concentrate on something else.
State of emergency is a fact in many countries right now, but it is not a novelty. It could have been interpreted to be a common and permanent state of today's societies, even before the Covid-19 virus emerged, in the era that could be described as a conjunction of crises: ecological, economical, social, political, etc. (see e.g. Hall&Massey: Interpreting the crisis). State of emergency - as a political gesture - offers a way to narrow down the possibilities of the masses to act and to express their opinion. Now it is used to protect us from the virus. We could discuss lengthy who all are included in this “us” we are talking about. The reactions and measures taken because of the Covid-19 virus, are not as democratic as the virus itself has been claimed to be. The state of emergency and the restrictions impact unequally various groups of peoples and individuals and it makes many ongoing repressive processes of the society blatantly visible. 

What kind of modes of behavior and what kind of politics (or policy making?) does the current state of emergency produce?  What kind of practices are being produced and who gains from them? Is there something familiar or recognizable in our reactions to the virus? Something which is resurfacing? Who and what gets protection through these measures, who and what does not? How does the state of exception alter our relationship to space and to other people? Could this state of exception create new forms of solidarity, new practices between people? What could they be? What happens with the restrictions created during the state of emergency after the crisis?

The hypothesis could be, that the actual state of emergency, if taken seriously, can help us to really dive into the world of today and to create some perspectives for the world of tomorrow.
The state of emergency can also be used as  an approach and a tool to create a contemporary stage. What would a Stage of Emergency look like? What happens there if anything at all? What do we show, share and see? What is hiding, hidden and invisible? What we see when we try to see the invisible, in this case the invisible possible being the virus, or something else…
The way we look at something is already limited by the ways we have learned to look at the things. We use the artistic, analytic and affectional tools we have at hand when starting to dig into a theme/phenomena/etc. There is dramaturgy to be found and created everywhere. What are the components of the situation, how they are inter-/intraconnected, inter-/intra-acting, effecting and affecting each other? What are the proportions chosen, how do we narrow down, what all we include and embrace and consider? Any virus and the reactions we might have to it, have their own dramaturgy, as well as any performance has its’ own particular dramaturgy.
What kind of dramaturgies are we drawn into from our research, questions and possible conclusions? What kind of dramaturgies does the world need right now? What kind of dramaturgies do you need? Could you work on that?